Over the past two weeks, university staff all over the country have braved freezing weather, bullying tactics from management and attempted press smears, to strike in defence of their pensions. In the space of five days of action, we’ve affected a complete transformation of the situation: students have turned up in force, the Universities UK is on the run. And now Unison members joining us in demonstrations on the pickets, while Further Education college staff have overwhelmingly balloted for strike action over pay reductions.

We have shown beyond any shadow of doubt that strikes work. Under the pressure of our action, the UUK has done a 180-degree inversion on its hardline position and has committed to meaningful negotiations without preconditions, and to arbitration. Ahead of negotiations on Monday, the UCU has contacted members with a proposal that we retain defined benefit at the cost of a “modest” increase in contributions.

Retaining defined benefit will undoubtedly be a victory for workers, and a defeat for the exploiters. We will have succeeded where other public sector workers (including nurses and doctors) were sadly defeated in beating back an unconscionable attack on our profession. But if the UUK accepts our compromise, which demands higher contributions and more risk for employees, then we are still swallowing a pension cut, and vice-chancellors will continue to reward themselves with six-figure salaries, courtesy of extortionate student fees. Not to mention the fact that retreating from the picket lines will take the momentum out of our FE colleagues’ action, and undercut attempts by Unison members to stand up for their interests.

The pension scheme I signed up for (and into which I have only lately started paying) will be damaged under the current proposal. Given the attacks our sector has endured over the past several years, we should accept nothing less than a complete withdrawal of UUK’s proposal. And if they say they cannot afford defined benefit with our current contributions, then we should fight with other university workers to remove the overpaid deadweights that we call management (and who continually bring our sector into disrepute with their outrageous pay packets), and run the sector ourselves.

Given the strength of the strike thus far, we have no reason to settle for anything less than total victory and no change whatsoever to our pensions. This has been a hugely successful action, in which students and staff have demonstrated an enormous degree of radical energy and turned picket lines into vibrant centres of learning through teach-outs and teach-ins – all on our own terms. Despite attempts by the right-wing press to drive a wedge between students and staff by constantly reiterating the financial ‘cost’ of our strike as a percentage of fees (which mostly don’t go to teaching regardless), the National Union of Students has offered us solidarity, local student unions all over the country have followed suit, and thousands of students have turned up to picket lines to show their support. The Times Higher Education Supplement confirms that most students see the bigger picture, and recognise that the UUK’s attack on pensions is only part of a wider process in which our campuses are being turned into businesses.

We all know the attack on the USS is not an isolated issue: it is just one more step along the road to total marketisation of education. This can be felt acutely in the form of extortionate student fees (especially for international students), endless and enormously expensive development projects, an unbearable pressure to meet research targets, a 15 percent pay cut for staff over the past decade and the widespread adoption of precarious teaching contracts – the JD Sports model of academia.

Our own figures reveal the rampancy of casualisation in the HE sector. I myself am a Graduate Teaching assistant – one of the silent workhorses of my university – scraping by on three jobs while writing up my thesis. When I submit, the future facing me is one of grinding fixed-term contracts and only the very distant prospect of meaningful employment. It is people like me, starting academics, who stand to lose most from the counter-reform to pensions, and who will still bear the brunt of the UCU’s compromise in the form of higher contributions and reduced security.

While frontline workers are paid less and students pay more, senior management reap the riches. Labour analysis of data published by the Times Higher Education Supplement shows that from 2010-11 to 2016-17, vice-chancellors’ benefits packages increased by 227 percent. My own principal (Ed Byrne of King’s College London) was found by a UCU FOI request to have earned £458,000 in 2014/5: and that is besides expenses on first-class flights and five-star accommodation. He subsequently took his colleagues to court (to the tune of £250,000, paid for out of students’ fees) to prevent the income of our senior leadership team being made public. Even Theresa May has attacked the sickening hypocrisy of Vice-Chancellors who reward themselves handsomely while attempting to slash their colleagues’ pensions.

This is all without mentioning the impact of marketisation on students. Between the burden of debt, uncertainty over future employment prospects, racist surveillance laws and abysmally expensive (and often simply abysmal) accommodation, it is little wonder that our student body is wracked by a mental health crisis. Every lecturer could cite examples of students who have crashed out of academia altogether under the pressure of stress and anxiety. These are the same students who have joined us in solidarity – with nothing whatsoever to gain from our dispute – and occupied their universities in protest at attacks on their teachers. The level of maturity and political acuity shown by our students over this dispute has been exceptional.

All across the sector, underpaid, overworked and often outsourced support staff (cleaners, porters, security teams administrators and so on) have been fighting against neglect and abuse from management. Outsourced cleaners at my university are currently struggling for the right to have pensions at all! Now our colleagues on campus are gearing up to join our struggle. Having helped organise a joint UCU/Unison demonstration at King’s, I have seen the capacity of lecturers and support workers, united for their common interests, to bring our institutions to a standstill. For a few hours on our second day of picketing, the university ground to a halt as we all withdrew our labour.

Thanks to this cross-union solidarity and student support, staff have developed a level of confidence I’ve never seen during any UCU action in the past. We can afford to be bold. Already, there has been a joint motion of no confidence in management passed at both the student union and local UCU branch at University Colleges London. We should repeat this on a national stage for the entire vice-chancellery.  

We have a golden opportunity to link with other education workers and fight for a much more fundamental change in society. We have a mandate for six months of action: imagine if we re-balloted to extend the strike’s remit to cover pay, casualisation and marketisation. Unison is in dispute up and down the country, and FE colleges are already striking over pay. Envision teachers at universities and colleges standing firm with support staff, for as long as it took to win all of our demands. Universities would have to reschedule academic years, and current students would rightly expect free resits for an entire term, which would put the issue of free education back on the agenda. Moreover, there is every chance our example could reignite action by nurses, doctors, firefighters, civil servants and other public sector workers who have seen their pay capped by the Tories.

All throughout Britain, ordinary people are being made to pay for an economic nightmare they did not create. The £6bn projected hole the UUK identified (however spuriously) in the Universal Superannuation Scheme stems from the historically low yields of UK government bonds, which in turn results from the quantitative easing that dragged capitalism out of the 2008 recession. This is veiled austerity, and as ever, it is ordinary workers who have to pay the tab on the bankers’ behalf. We should unite in opposition to this injustice, and to the right-wing politicians that abet it.

John McDonnell recently said at a Goldsmiths’ teach-in that this strike could bring down the government, and I happen to think he has a point. What we have seen developing on campuses is the germ of a public sector-wide strike: one with the potential to bring the Conservatives to their knees. The weakness of May’s administration is evidenced by its tepid stance on this strike. Universities minister Sam Gyimah called on the UUK to acquiesce to talks after a handful of strike days: contrast this with the bullishness with which Jeremy Hunt battled the junior doctors in 2016.

Rest assured, the Tories have not been moved to declare sympathy with striking staff out of the goodness of their hearts. The government is in a desperately weakened position following the Tories’ disastrous performance at the last general election. The Tories lack the confidence to back their capitalist cronies over this issue, given the firm pushback from workers and students. The Conservatives should be spared no mercy: they and their friends in the UUK are responsible for this mess.

If the UUK negotiators dig their heels in, UCU should join with other public sector unions and mobilise for a general opposition to privatisation and marketisation of public services. The union should reach out to students by framing our dispute as part of a wider fightback against the commodification of education, and a struggle for free education, provided on the basis of a democratic, socialist society.

The NUS, for its part, should take advantage of huge student support for staff and bring its membership out onto the streets to keep fighting until this vision is achieved. Moreover, the Labour Party should build upon the support it has shown and give political leadership to this movement – putting into practice Corbyn’s promise for free, cradle-to-grave education for all.

Throughout this strike, staff and students have gained a sense of their collective power. At my university, only 11 percent of classes have gone ahead on strike days. We have demonstrated in the eyes of the world that, without the permission of education workers, the education system cannot function. That same logic applies to every facet of society. The 50 year anniversary of the student and worker-led struggle against Charles de Gaulle in 1968 feels like a fitting moment to stake a claim for a society run democratically in the interests of the majority. One in which education is respected as a public good, not a profit-driven enterprise run in the interests of the rich.

I have been proud to strike alongside my colleagues, and our achievements are considerable – but we all know this isn’t just about pensions. The fact is, education will never be safe with the Conservatives in power. I want to save the education sector from exploitation: I want it to be free, and I want education workers paid decently, employed reliably and promised security in old age. And the fantastic thing is, that looks now perfectly achievable, but only if we push harder.

Joe Attard (King’s College London UCU anti-casualisation rep, personal capacity)


Share this article!

Looking for the communists?

We've moved to over to a new website! Head here for communist news, theory, and activity, brought to you by the RCP! Feel free to exit this pop-up to read the MSF archives.

RCP logo with title black red

This will close in 0 seconds